Skip to main content

Understanding the Swiss Trust Landscape With Matthew Ledvina

Matthew Ledvina

Matthew Ledvina, JD, LLM (US Taxation) outlines essential considerations for foreign trustees in relation to trusts linked to Switzerland. 

Key Considerations 

Identifying the Challenge 

Trustees are increasingly finding themselves entangled in Swiss civil and criminal legal proceedings. They are becoming common participants in intricate transnational disputes and often find themselves in the crosshairs of disgruntled beneficiaries, alienated family members, or former spouses. 

What’s at Stake for Me? 

It's crucial for foreign trustees to recognize that they might be subject to litigation before Swiss courts, especially if the trust is managed in Switzerland or the settlor resides in Switzerland. 

Key Takeaways 

Maintaining an understanding of how Swiss laws, both procedural and substantive, can influence the administration of a trust—and most critically, its assets—is vital. This knowledge can help in circumventing unforeseen complications. 

Detailed Analysis 

Growing Popularity and Legal Complexities 

Switzerland has witnessed a consistent uptick in its reputation as a prime location for trust administration and associated services. With this increase has come a rise in litigation involving trust structures. Legal battles are not confined to civil courts; claimants are progressively bringing their grievances to criminal prosecution bodies. 

Despite Switzerland’s ratification of the Hague Convention of 1 July 1985 on the Law Applicable to Trusts and on their Recognition in 2007, acknowledging foreign trusts, the Swiss legal system—a civil law jurisdiction—does not recognize the common-law concept of dividing legal ownership (trustee) from beneficial ownership (beneficiary). This dichotomy presents practical challenges for Swiss judges and prosecutors as they navigate both the regulations governing the trust and their own, sometimes conflicting, legal and procedural principles. 

Civil Legal Matters 

Seeking Information 

Swiss courts will assume jurisdiction in cases where the trustee is based in Switzerland, Switzerland is designated as the place of administration in the trust deed, or the trust is essentially managed from Switzerland, provided the trust deed does not explicitly point to a foreign court. To mitigate jurisdictional uncertainties, the trust document should include a forum selection clause and clearly indicate the trust’s place of administration. 

Inheritance Legalities in Switzerland 

Swiss inheritance law mandates certain forced-heirship rights, ensuring that spouses, descendants, or parents (if no descendants exist) receive a guaranteed portion of the estate. The application of forced-heirship rights depends on the assets left to heirs at the time of the testator’s death and, in some instances, on inter vivos transfers. 

Swiss courts have not yet established a precedent for handling trusts under Swiss inheritance law. However, the consensus among legal scholars is that transfers to trusts are considered as either revocable or irrevocable gifts, influencing the calculation of forced-heirship rights. Assets placed in a trust may be subject to clawback claims if the settlor was a Swiss resident at the time of their death, with firewall provisions in the applicable trust law potentially not providing protection. 

Divorce Proceedings in Switzerland 

Under the standard Swiss matrimonial property regime, spouses maintain individual control over their respective properties during marriage. Upon death or divorce, each spouse is entitled to half of the property acquired by the other during the marriage. Transfers to trusts can influence the division of property, especially if the transfer occurred within five years of initiating divorce proceedings or was intended to deprive the other spouse of their share. 

The famous Rybolovlev case serves as a noteworthy example, where the Geneva Court of Appeal ruled that trust assets must be included in the calculation of matrimonial property claims, highlighting the complexities of trusts in Swiss divorce proceedings. 

Criminal Legal Matters 

Filing a Criminal Complaint Involving Trust Assets 

The eligibility to file a criminal complaint when trust assets are involved is a grey area, with sparse and inconsistent court decisions. Typically, the trustee, being the legal owner of the trust assets, holds the capacity to act as a plaintiff in criminal proceedings. However, recent cases have seen beneficiaries taking on this role, adding another layer of complexity to the legal landscape. 

Challenging Legal Actions Involving Trust Assets 

Trustees are generally the only party able to challenge legal actions involving trust assets, such as asset seizure or property searches. This is due to their status as the legal owner of the involved assets. However, the question of extending this right to beneficiaries, particularly when the trust structure has been dissolved, remains open. 

Criminal Liability of Trusts 

Since 2003, Swiss law has held that companies, including foreign-law structures, can face criminal liability. While this has yet to be tested in relation to trusts, there is a theoretical risk, particularly if the trust engages in commercial activities akin to those of a company. 

Recent Legal Developments 

Switzerland’s recent adoption of the Financial Action Task Force’s revised recommendations has implications for trusts, particularly in relation to tax offences and money laundering. Since 1 January 2016, ‘qualified tax offences’ can serve as a basis for money laundering charges, increasing scrutiny on trusts, especially those perceived as being established for tax avoidance purposes. 

Conclusion 

The establishment of a foreign trust does not provide absolute protection from involvement in Swiss legal proceedings. Foreign trustees must be cognizant of the potential implications of having a connection to Switzerland, whether through asset location, administration practices, or the residency of involved parties. Navigating the Swiss legal landscape requires a comprehensive understanding of both Swiss and home jurisdiction laws, ensuring that trustees are prepared for the unique challenges presented by Swiss proceedings.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Best Ways for Americans to Make Donations to International Charities

Donating to a non-profit charitable organization is one of the best ways of helping others who are in need. In general, there are several charities that work for different causes such as providing disaster relief, healthcare facilities for the poor, protecting animals from cruelty, etc. Considering the USA, charities raise billions of dollars each year for the betterment of mankind, the animal kingdom, and the planet Earth. In fact, the annual charity generation in the USA is one of the highest in the world. Among the billions of dollars, most donations are made to the US charities while the remaining small portion goes to the international charitable organizations. No doubt, there are many Americans who are eager to donate their fortune to international charities but due to some reason they don’t. One of the foremost problems is that most international charities do not provide tax deductions to the US citizens and as a result, most people choose to make donations to US charitie...

What Happens Now the GAO is Looking at PPLI?

It’s the question that everyone in the industry is asking right now, so we sat down with an expert to hear more. Matthew Ledvina is a cross border tax specialist with an extensive knowledge of PPLI and he was willing to sit down with us and shed light on the GAO’s latest activities: “Firstly, I want to say home important it is that an institution with the reputation and reach of the United States Government Accountability Office is taking this part of the industry seriously. I’ve been warning about the abuse of a number of variable insurance products and the wide-ranging implications such practices are having on the industry.” It’s certainly something of a hot topic right now, so does this mean an end to all offshore arrangements for high net worth individuals? “Absolutely not, this is more of a cleanup as it were. The key thing to note here is the IRS themselves openly acknowledge the legitimacy of many offshore life insurance products and the benefits they offer. What the GAO ...

U.S. Tax Treatment of Annuities

As with life insurance, annuities are tax-favored investments under the Code. Unlike life insurance, however, the primary income tax benefit of an annuity is derived from the compounding effect of the tax deferral on the investment gains within the contract, rather than the avoidance of income tax, as with investment in a life insurance policy. Generally, under § 72(a), gross income includes any amount received as an annuity under an annuity, endowment, or life insurance contract. The income tax effect of an annuity depends, however, on numerous factors, such as whether the tax is being applied to a distribution during the a nnuity’s accumulation period or annuitization period and whether the distribution occurs after the death of the holder of the annuity contract or after the death of the annuitant (assuming that the holder and the annuitant are different persons). Section 72: Annuity Contract Defined To qualify as an annuity, the annuity contract must satisfy the requirements o...