Skip to main content

U.S. Tax Treatment of Annuities

Matthew Ledvina


As with life insurance, annuities are tax-favored investments under the Code. Unlike life insurance, however, the primary income tax benefit of an annuity is derived from the compounding effect of the tax deferral on the investment gains within the contract, rather than the avoidance of income tax, as with investment in a life insurance policy. Generally, under § 72(a), gross income includes any amount received as an annuity under an annuity, endowment, or life insurance contract. The income tax effect of an annuity depends, however, on numerous factors, such as whether the tax is being applied to a distribution during the annuity’s accumulation period or annuitization period and whether the distribution occurs after the death of the holder of the annuity contract or after the death of the annuitant (assuming that the holder and the annuitant are different persons).

Section 72: Annuity Contract Defined

To qualify as an annuity, the annuity contract must satisfy the requirements of § 72. An annuity is a contract, generally issued by an insurance company, providing for regular payments to an annuitant and, potentially, to a beneficiary following the annuitant’s death. The Treasury Regulations state that to be considered “amounts received as an annuity,” such amounts should be:

·        received on or after the annuity starting date;

·        payable at regular intervals; and

·        payable over a period of at least one year from the annuity starting date.

 

Further, the total of the amounts payable must be determinable as of the annuity starting date..

Payments may also be considered amounts received as an annuity if they are paid under a variable annuity contract, despite the fact that the total of the amounts payable under the variable contract may not be determinable as of the annuity starting date, if the amounts are to be paid for a definite or determinable time. If, because of positive investment experience in the variable annuity contract or other factors, the payment with respect to the annuity exceeds the investment in the contract (adjusted for any refund feature) divided by the number of anticipated periodic payments, then only part of the payment will be considered an amount received as an annuity. The excess is an “amount not received as an annuity.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Best Ways for Americans to Make Donations to International Charities

Donating to a non-profit charitable organization is one of the best ways of helping others who are in need. In general, there are several charities that work for different causes such as providing disaster relief, healthcare facilities for the poor, protecting animals from cruelty, etc. Considering the USA, charities raise billions of dollars each year for the betterment of mankind, the animal kingdom, and the planet Earth. In fact, the annual charity generation in the USA is one of the highest in the world. Among the billions of dollars, most donations are made to the US charities while the remaining small portion goes to the international charitable organizations. No doubt, there are many Americans who are eager to donate their fortune to international charities but due to some reason they don’t. One of the foremost problems is that most international charities do not provide tax deductions to the US citizens and as a result, most people choose to make donations to US charitie...
1 comment
Read more

Clarifying U.S. Gift Tax on Wire Transfers of "Cash" from Non-U.S. Persons to U.S. Residents

By Matthew Ledvina , JD, LLM (US Taxation) Introduction In a globalized financial landscape, a recurring question perplexing tax practitioners is whether wire transfers of "cash" from non-U.S. persons to U.S. residents are subject to U.S. gift tax. The crux of the matter revolves around whether these wire transfers are classified as tangible or intangible assets under U.S. Tax Code §2501(a). Historical Context Although existing guidelines like Private Letter Rulings (PLRs) and General Counsels Memoranda (GCMs) offer some insights, these are largely outdated and may not suit the complexities of modern finance. Specifically, references like PLR 8210055 and older GCMs (such as GCM 36860 from 1976 and GCM 34845 from 1972) leave much to be desired in terms of current applicability. Additionally, the Curry v. McCanless case from 1939 further complicates the issue by defining intangibles as rights unrelated to physical things.  Bank Deposits as Intangibles According to Regulation §2...
Post a Comment
Read more

Private Derivatives: A Wealth Structuring Solution in the US

By Matthew Ledvina , JD, LLM (US Taxation) Introduction  When it comes to wealth structuring in the US, traditional methods often center around the direct transfer of assets. However, there are circumstances where such asset transfer becomes either impractical or impossible, or where doing so could trigger complex tax implications. This article explores how private derivatives can serve as a versatile alternative for wealth structuring in the US.  Why Is This Important?  If direct asset transfers pose difficulties due to taxation, legal constraints, or other issues, private derivatives present an avenue for transferring the economic value associated with an asset. This is especially applicable to business owners, executives, and fund managers in the realms of private equity, venture capital, and hedge funds.  Understanding Private Derivatives  Private derivatives are contractual frameworks that enable individuals to transfer the economic upside linked to an asse...
Post a Comment
Read more