Skip to main content

U.S. Tax Treatment of Annuities

Matthew Ledvina


As with life insurance, annuities are tax-favored investments under the Code. Unlike life insurance, however, the primary income tax benefit of an annuity is derived from the compounding effect of the tax deferral on the investment gains within the contract, rather than the avoidance of income tax, as with investment in a life insurance policy. Generally, under § 72(a), gross income includes any amount received as an annuity under an annuity, endowment, or life insurance contract. The income tax effect of an annuity depends, however, on numerous factors, such as whether the tax is being applied to a distribution during the annuity’s accumulation period or annuitization period and whether the distribution occurs after the death of the holder of the annuity contract or after the death of the annuitant (assuming that the holder and the annuitant are different persons).

Section 72: Annuity Contract Defined

To qualify as an annuity, the annuity contract must satisfy the requirements of § 72. An annuity is a contract, generally issued by an insurance company, providing for regular payments to an annuitant and, potentially, to a beneficiary following the annuitant’s death. The Treasury Regulations state that to be considered “amounts received as an annuity,” such amounts should be:

·        received on or after the annuity starting date;

·        payable at regular intervals; and

·        payable over a period of at least one year from the annuity starting date.

 

Further, the total of the amounts payable must be determinable as of the annuity starting date..

Payments may also be considered amounts received as an annuity if they are paid under a variable annuity contract, despite the fact that the total of the amounts payable under the variable contract may not be determinable as of the annuity starting date, if the amounts are to be paid for a definite or determinable time. If, because of positive investment experience in the variable annuity contract or other factors, the payment with respect to the annuity exceeds the investment in the contract (adjusted for any refund feature) divided by the number of anticipated periodic payments, then only part of the payment will be considered an amount received as an annuity. The excess is an “amount not received as an annuity.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Best Ways for Americans to Make Donations to International Charities

Donating to a non-profit charitable organization is one of the best ways of helping others who are in need. In general, there are several charities that work for different causes such as providing disaster relief, healthcare facilities for the poor, protecting animals from cruelty, etc. Considering the USA, charities raise billions of dollars each year for the betterment of mankind, the animal kingdom, and the planet Earth. In fact, the annual charity generation in the USA is one of the highest in the world. Among the billions of dollars, most donations are made to the US charities while the remaining small portion goes to the international charitable organizations. No doubt, there are many Americans who are eager to donate their fortune to international charities but due to some reason they don’t. One of the foremost problems is that most international charities do not provide tax deductions to the US citizens and as a result, most people choose to make donations to US charitie...
1 comment
Read more

What Happens Now the GAO is Looking at PPLI?

It’s the question that everyone in the industry is asking right now, so we sat down with an expert to hear more. Matthew Ledvina is a cross border tax specialist with an extensive knowledge of PPLI and he was willing to sit down with us and shed light on the GAO’s latest activities: “Firstly, I want to say home important it is that an institution with the reputation and reach of the United States Government Accountability Office is taking this part of the industry seriously. I’ve been warning about the abuse of a number of variable insurance products and the wide-ranging implications such practices are having on the industry.” It’s certainly something of a hot topic right now, so does this mean an end to all offshore arrangements for high net worth individuals? “Absolutely not, this is more of a cleanup as it were. The key thing to note here is the IRS themselves openly acknowledge the legitimacy of many offshore life insurance products and the benefits they offer. What the GAO ...
Post a Comment
Read more