Matthew Ledvina’s Involvement With a Boutique Law Firm

Matthew Ledvina is presently focusing on his role as the managing director of the Fintech company based in London. Even though that endeavour is his central concern for the foreseeable future, he continues to advise family offices on the optimal tax and investment strategies for cross-border families.

After leaving Baker McKenzie, the law firm where he worked for around five years, Matthew worked at the Julius Baer bank in Zurich as the executive director of the Head of UK Wealth Planning. During this time, Matthew collaborated with friends from Baker McKenzie to create a new law firm that focused on cross-border financial and tax matters. After spending only one year at the bank, Matthew and his friends from Baker McKenzie founded a boutique law firm. During the years 2010 to 2018, this company proved to be a success for Matthew, and it grew from a small company of four employees to a larger venture that employed 40, with offices in Zurich, Geneva, and Lugano. Matthew left the firm in 2018 to create a new private office servicing US connected families, and to pursue his passion for the Fintech entrepreneurship. Today, he is hard at work pursuing a passion for venture capital and the Fintech. He still provides families with capital preservation strategies at a private office, with a focus on cross-border tax optimization and succession issues. However, his main focus is serving as a managing director of the Fintech startup in London that specializes in asset-backed lending.

Comments

Best Ways for Americans to Make Donations to International Charities

Donating to a non-profit charitable organization is one of the best ways of helping others who are in need. In general, there are several charities that work for different causes such as providing disaster relief, healthcare facilities for the poor, protecting animals from cruelty, etc. Considering the USA, charities raise billions of dollars each year for the betterment of mankind, the animal kingdom, and the planet Earth. In fact, the annual charity generation in the USA is one of the highest in the world. Among the billions of dollars, most donations are made to the US charities while the remaining small portion goes to the international charitable organizations. No doubt, there are many Americans who are eager to donate their fortune to international charities but due to some reason they don’t. One of the foremost problems is that most international charities do not provide tax deductions to the US citizens and as a result, most people choose to make donations to US charitie...

Navigating Swiss-US Estate Planning: What You Need to Know

By Matthew Ledvina , JD, LLM (US Taxation) If you have connections to both Switzerland and the United States, managing your estate—basically, what you own—can be like walking through a maze. Both countries have their own rules, and they don't always play well together. Let's break down some of the tricky areas you might encounter, so you can avoid unpleasant surprises for you and your heirs. Different Rules for Different Lands In Switzerland, if you pass away, the laws of the last place you lived will usually govern what happens to your stuff. This includes both your bank accounts and your real estate, whether they are located in Switzerland or elsewhere. But the United States takes a different approach. The place where real estate is located will have its own set of rules, separate from the rules governing personal property like bank accounts. This can create confusion when estates have assets in both countries. I nheritance: A Tightrope Walk Switzerland has strict rules a...

Clarifying U.S. Gift Tax on Wire Transfers of "Cash" from Non-U.S. Persons to U.S. Residents

By Matthew Ledvina , JD, LLM (US Taxation) Introduction In a globalized financial landscape, a recurring question perplexing tax practitioners is whether wire transfers of "cash" from non-U.S. persons to U.S. residents are subject to U.S. gift tax. The crux of the matter revolves around whether these wire transfers are classified as tangible or intangible assets under U.S. Tax Code §2501(a). Historical Context Although existing guidelines like Private Letter Rulings (PLRs) and General Counsels Memoranda (GCMs) offer some insights, these are largely outdated and may not suit the complexities of modern finance. Specifically, references like PLR 8210055 and older GCMs (such as GCM 36860 from 1976 and GCM 34845 from 1972) leave much to be desired in terms of current applicability. Additionally, the Curry v. McCanless case from 1939 further complicates the issue by defining intangibles as rights unrelated to physical things. Bank Deposits as Intangibles According to Regulation §2...

Matthew Ledvina

Search This Blog